Interval Appendectomy: Finding the Breaking Point for Cost-Effectiveness.

نویسندگان

  • Lara Senekjian
  • Raminder Nirula
  • Brandon Bellows
  • Richard Nelson
چکیده

BACKGROUND Patients with phlegmonous appendicitis can be managed nonoperatively, yet debate continues about the need for interval appendectomy (IA), given the low risk of recurrence or neoplasm. We sought to determine for which patient age interval appendectomy is cost-effective. METHODS Using TreeAge software, a cost-effectiveness model was developed. Two strategies were compared, IA and no interval appendectomy (NIA). Interval appendectomy patients were modeled with probability of benign pathology, cancer or inflammatory bowel disease, and possible operative complications. Patients with NIA were modeled with the probability of recurrence. The probability of malignancy or inflammatory bowel disease developing, or death occurring during a lifetime, was modeled. Base case scenarios at 18, 35, and 50 years old were completed using a Monte Carlo microsimulation. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was completed using 2-dimensional sample as a Monte Carlo microsimulation to account for variability for patients 18 to 60 years old. Probabilities of complications developing, pathologic diagnosis requiring additional management, and state utility were extracted from published data. Costs were collected from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and utility was quality-adjusted life years (QALY). RESULTS For an 18-year-old patient, IA costs $9,417.22 with a gain of 16.59 QALYs compared with NIA, which costs $11,613.57 with a gain of 16.52 QALYs. For a 35-year-old, IA costs $8,989.16 with 9.1 QALYs gained. No interval appendectomy costs $6,614.61 and 9.09 QALYs gained. For the 35-year-old patient, the interval cost-effectiveness ratio comparing NIA with IA is $237,455/QALY. As patient age increases, the interval cost-effectiveness ratio increases. Using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY, IA remains cost-effective until the patient is 33 years old. CONCLUSIONS Interval appendectomy should be considered in patients younger than 34 years of age.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Watchful waiting versus interval appendectomy for patients who recovered from acute appendicitis with tumor formation: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND Interval appendectomy after conservative treatment of appendicitis with tumor formation remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of interval appendectomy based on a cost-effectiveness analysis. METHODS This was a retrospective study including appendicitis patients with tumor formation who received conservative treatment at first admission to Tai...

متن کامل

Therapeutic effectiveness of percutaneous drainage and factors for performing an interval appendectomy in pediatric appendiceal abscess

BACKGROUND In this study, we studied the therapeutic effectiveness of percutaneous drainage with antibiotics and the need for an interval appendectomy for treating appendiceal abscess in children with a research-oriented dataset released by the Bureau of National Health Insurance in Taiwan through the Collaboration Center for Health Information Application (CCHIA). METHODS We identified 1225 ...

متن کامل

Early vs interval appendectomy for children with perforated appendicitis.

OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness and adverse event rates of early vs interval appendectomy in children with perforated appendicitis. DESIGN Nonblinded randomized trial. SETTING A tertiary-referral urban children's hospital. PATIENTS A total of 131 patients younger than 18 years with a preoperative diagnosis of perforated appendicitis. INTERVENTIONS Early appendectomy (within 24 ho...

متن کامل

Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopy in children.

BACKGROUND Laparoscopy may offer fast recovery and improved cosmesis, but its cost has been perceived as excessive. OBJECTIVE To analyze the total hospital costs of laparoscopy vs open surgery. DESIGN Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis evaluating all cases performed in a 36-month period (September 1995 to August 1998). Cases were evaluated for operative time, itemized cost of supplie...

متن کامل

Trends in utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.

BACKGROUND Although a number of trials have analyzed the outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy, the clinical advantages, and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic appendectomy in the management of acute and perforated appendicitis are still not clearly defined. The aim of this study was to examine utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy using a national admini...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of the American College of Surgeons

دوره 223 4  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016